| The management magazine for auto dealer professionals |
ADVERTISEMENT ADVERTISEMENT |
![]()
Special Coverage
|
|||||||
Mercedes-Benz CL big residual loser.
|
Then it helps remarketers, leasing firms and fleet managers oversee portfolios by providing them with data on trade-in values, used-car appraisals and RVI forecasts of what vehicles likely will be worth when they come off-lease and enter the remarketing arena.
System subscribers also will receive estimates, based on tracking of collected consumer behavior, on the likelihood that a customer driving a particular leased car will keep it for the full term of the lease or turn it in early.
The system provides reports by model, make, segment and model year, among other categories. Various data sources are used, including Ward’s, NADA, auto auctions and RVI, itself.
RVI is a firm that offers lessors insurance against residual losses. “So we have a lot of money riding on our predictions,” Sampieri says.
He adds: “Portfolio risk management became so important when leasing was so upside down” during bloodletting residual losses of the late 1990s.
The trick these days is being able to separate the winners from the losers, Rene M. Abdalah, an RVI Group vice president, says.
For example, culprits coming off lease with dramatic residual losses include the Mercedes-Benz CL (about $13,000) and Jaguar S-Type (about $7,000), he says. Other off-lease losers include the Volvo C70, Toyota Sienna and Ford Windstar.
But the losses are scattered and nowhere near the carnage of the last decade.
Indeed, says Abdalah, “we’re starting to see some gains,” with off-lease vehicles actually worth more than their residual predictions set at the beginning of their leases.
Improvements in accurate residual forecasting have been “dramatic,” Sampieri says.
“All lessors have learned their lessons from the late 1990s,” he says. “At least, we think they have.”
| Contact Us | Advertising | Privacy Statement | Terms of Use |